“A mere compliance with law is not enough; the public servant also has to have a well-developed sensibility to ethical issues for effective discharge of duties.” Do you agree? Explain with the help of two examples, where (i) an act is ethically right but not legally, and (ii) an act is legally right but not ethically. (UPSC 2015, 10 Marks, )

EN ह

A mere compliance with law is not enough

1. Law as a Minimum Standard:

 Following the law is the minimum requirement for any public servant.

 It ensures that the baseline rules and regulations are met.

2. Limitations of Legal Compliance:

 Laws can sometimes be inadequate or outdated in addressing complex ethical dilemmas.

 Strict adherence to the law may not necessarily result in morally or socially responsible actions.

3. Addressing Moral Gray Areas:

 Public service often involves situations with moral gray areas.

 Relying solely on legal compliance can lead to ethically questionable decisions.

4. Public Trust and Accountability:

 Mere legal compliance can erode public trust if the public perceives actions as morally wrong.

 Public servants are accountable not just for legality but also for ethical conduct.

Public servant have sensibility to ethical issues for effective discharge of duties

1. Understanding Ethical Issues:

 Ethical sensibility means the ability to recognize and understand complex ethical issues.

 Public servants must be equipped to navigate these issues effectively.

2. Balancing Competing Interests:

 Public servants often face situations where they must balance competing interests.

 Ethical sensibility helps in making decisions that consider the broader societal good.

3. Building Public Confidence:

 Public servants with strong ethical sensibility inspire confidence in the government.

 Citizens are more likely to trust and support leaders who demonstrate ethical awareness.

4. Long-Term Sustainability:

 Ethical sensibility promotes sustainable decision-making.

 It helps public servants avoid short-term gains that may harm society in the long run.

5. Preventing Corruption and Misconduct:

 An ethical sensibility acts as a safeguard against corruption and misconduct.

 It encourages public servants to resist unethical pressures.

6. Legal vs. Ethical Compliance:

 Legal compliance and ethical sensibility often intersect but can also diverge.

 Ethical sensibility ensures that actions align with higher moral principles.

Example (i) An Act That Is Ethically Right, but Not Legally

Civil Disobedience During the Civil Rights Movement in the United States

In the mid-20th century, African Americans in the United States were subjected to systemic racial segregation and discrimination, particularly in the Southern states.

Civil rights activists like Rosa Parks and Martin Luther King Jr. believed it was ethically right to resist these unjust laws and practices.

They engaged in acts of civil disobedience, such as refusing to give up their seats on segregated buses and organizing peaceful protests, despite these actions being illegal under segregation laws.

Explanation:

Ethical rightness: Challenging racial segregation and advocating for equal rights and justice for all citizens was widely seen as morally justified.

Legal wrongness: Civil rights activists knowingly violated segregation laws, leading to their arrests and legal penalties.

Moral conviction and nonviolent resistance played a crucial role in eventually changing these unjust laws, leading to the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which outlawed racial segregation.

Example (ii) An Act That Is Legally Right, but Not Ethical

Corporate Tax Avoidance

Many multinational corporations engage in complex financial practices to legally minimize their tax obligations, often routing profits through countries with low tax rates.

These practices are often within the bounds of existing tax laws, but they can be viewed as ethically questionable because they reduce the resources available for public services and infrastructure in the countries where these corporations operate.

Explanation:

Legal rightness: Corporate tax avoidance strategies are designed to take advantage of legal loopholes or international tax treaties that allow such practices.

Ethical wrongness: Critics argue that these actions are ethically wrong because they undermine the social contract and deprive governments of revenue needed to fund essential services like healthcare, education, and infrastructure.

Public debate and regulatory efforts seek to address this ethical dilemma by reforming tax laws and corporate practices to align more closely with societal values and fairness.